I think I see what you mean. Yes - I can extend my tests to better cover the business rules and force me to write the correct implementation of validators.
Thanks!
Goran
Thanks!
Goran
↧
Channel:
Fluent Validation for .NET
X
Are you the publisher?
Claim or
contact us
about this channel.
X
0
Channel Details:
- Title: Fluent Validation for .NET
- Channel Number: 1275115
- Language: English
- Registered On: November 18, 2011, 7:12 am
- Number of Articles: 1917
- Latest Snapshot: December 28, 2016, 5:00 pm
- RSS URL: http://fluentvalidation.codeplex.com/project/feeds/rss
- Publisher: http://fluentvalidation.codeplex.com/project/feeds/rss
- Description: A small validation library for .NET that uses a fluent interface and lambda expressions for...
- Catalog: //indraught1.rssing.com/catalog.php?indx=1275115
© 2025 //www.rssing.com